In a recent press release, JPMorgan Chase announced it has reached a $13 billion settlement in principle negotiated by the President's Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities Working Group of the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force. This announcement was made a week following Freddie Mac announcing since 2009, $71.3 billion in dividends to be paid to the U.S. taxpayers and Fannie Mae announcing $114 billion in dividends to be paid through December 2013. In total the U.S. Treasury will receive over $198 billion in dividends. These companies have also created programs to assist individuals in distressed homes and implemented programs to prevent future poor business practices. This is great for potential buyers and individuals going through the foreclosure procedure but what about the individuals who have already lost their homes as a result of the meltdown? These families have been forgotten and were just collateral damage. To strength the housing market and increase home ownership, these agencies responsible for the meltdown have to assist those families who have lost there homes.
Simple measure to assist those whom have lost their homes is to commit resources to develop a claim center with federal fraud oversight. The claim center will be responsible helping families find a house of equal or comparable value to the home lost; assist with a below market interest rate loan; provide a down-payment exemption; and work with credit agencies to repair individual's credit.
For individuals currently unemployed or not financially capable of paying on a house, the claim center needs to establish a reasonable grace period equal to the previous ownership period. This will allow those individuals time to get back on his or her feet.
The measure will help the home ownership rates rebound from what is currently reported by the U.S. Census Bureau as record lows this year.
Home ownership is the key to America's economic recovery. The two goes hand and hand. When home ownership is up, the economy is stable. Although ownership is low, it is getting better. This is evident in Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, and JPMorgan Chase's ability to report steady profits. As long as the profits continue and the companies make good on their promises, the economy will continue to grow along with the housing market.
Wednesday, November 20, 2013
Wednesday, November 6, 2013
My House Is Shrinking
It's two and a half paces from the right side of my bed to
the bathroom door. From the bathroom
door to exit the bedroom, it's five
paces. Just outside the bedroom door to
the left, is the top of the stairs. Down 13 steps, a left
turn, a half step forward, another left turn, then 12 paces leads to the front entrance. I've walked this same pattern
consistently for the past five years and
the distance never changes.
Occasionally, I may bend forward to massage my aching arthritic knees or
stop to stretch my lower back but my strides remain the same. Yet I
believe my house is shrinking around me significantly. I can't physically see it shrinking nor will measurements
prove it. I can only feel it as the days
pass.
When I mentioned it to my two children, the room became silent and I was given a weird look. They claimed that I'm losing my mind and asked that I stop embarrassing them in front of their friends. My wife probably agrees with the children. She hasn't said it but I can see it in her facial expression. Every time ask for her opinion, she becomes dismissive and tells me to figure it out. I now have a few theories to how my house is shrinking.
Individuals looking to purchase a house often get introduced to a house with light colored walls, open bright windows, and 100 watt light bulbs shining in every room. All the bright lights and light colors are used to create an illusion of endlessness. This makes the rooms seem bigger than they actually are. Brighter rooms also look cleaner which also make them more inviting.
Furniture placement also important in making rooms seem
bigger. Furniture that doesn't fit in a
room properly make the room seem cluttered and uneasy to navigate. This
can make an individual uncomfortable and cramped.
In addition to the lighting and furniture placement, another
theory is that my family is still growing.
At the time of purchase, neither of my children were teenagers. Now they
are teenager and require more personal space for themselves and their
belongings. The amount of friends that visit
on a regular bases has tripled and the invasion seems to never stops. For
individuals looking to buy a house, it's always good to take in consideration
family planning. How many children are
desired? And, will this space be adequate
enough for a growing family?
My house isn't shrinking. My styling preferences and growing family has changed the dimensions of the house.
Wednesday, October 30, 2013
Credible Real Estate Writing Source
It's been said, "They can't put anything on the internet that it's true." This is the most incredible news I've ever heard. No longer do I have to waste countless hours scouring the internet in search of valid real estate information to complete my research paper. Everything is true. I can just stop at the very first site listed on my search engine results and start typing. Just like, I'm sure somewhere on the internet there is a rule that states, "Educators have to give good grades to any student who signs-up for their class and shows little effort." I, personally, haven't found it yet but I'm confident a team of scientists at Wiki will post this rule to the internet very soon. It will be a total game changer; learning will be obsolete. As soon as this information is affirmed, it will be the second most incredible news I've ever heard. Until that time comes I recommend, for all things real estate, individuals use the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development website (http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD).
The HUD website contains useful press releases; updated housing laws; and helpful consumer tips. The website also includes links to other government sponsored organizations associated with the housing market regulated by government. I'm not saying an individual won't find this information on a similar website but in the months of searching, I've found that most real estate websites are profit driven and flooded with advertisements. Even websites traditional marketed as an .org have been misleading and tailored to realtors or mortgage brokers. Limited information is provided to consumers.
To be an effective real estate writer, it's important to present all the information on a particular topic in a way everyone can understand and make his or her decisions based on the fact. If information is omitted or unclear, it could lead to multiple problems for everyone in the housing market in the long run. To avoid this, it's best to get the correct and complete information straight from the source (HUD.gov).
The HUD website contains useful press releases; updated housing laws; and helpful consumer tips. The website also includes links to other government sponsored organizations associated with the housing market regulated by government. I'm not saying an individual won't find this information on a similar website but in the months of searching, I've found that most real estate websites are profit driven and flooded with advertisements. Even websites traditional marketed as an .org have been misleading and tailored to realtors or mortgage brokers. Limited information is provided to consumers.
To be an effective real estate writer, it's important to present all the information on a particular topic in a way everyone can understand and make his or her decisions based on the fact. If information is omitted or unclear, it could lead to multiple problems for everyone in the housing market in the long run. To avoid this, it's best to get the correct and complete information straight from the source (HUD.gov).
Wednesday, October 23, 2013
The Logical Renter
The United States Census Bureau reports home-ownership is down from 62% to 53% since 2009. It also reports that the average age for first-time homeowners increased from 31 to 38 years old. Some may argue that these changes are as a result of the 2008 housing market crisis but nothing could be further from the truth. These changes are solely the result of higher interest rates. As interest rates continue to rise more and more Americans choose to fore-go home-ownership. For these individuals, renting is the best alternative and proves to be more financially sound than purchasing.
Renting vs. Buying a home: The math of renting vs. buying a home. Challenging the notion that it is always better to buy.
Renters are at a greater financial advantage than homeowners. For example, when an individual rents a place to live, he or she may only be required to pay some type of security deposit. This security deposit, in most cases, is equal to the first month's rent. It is refunded when an individual vacant the property provided that he or she has meets all contractual obligations. This is not the case for buyers. Buyers using a conventional mortgage are required to have 20% of the purchase price as a down payment plus additional money to cover closing cost. The down payment and closing cost could easily be 50 times more than any security deposit renters are required to pay.
Another advantage to renting is renter are not required to pay maintenance or repairs cost unless the damage is directly caused by the renter. Maintenance and repairs are the responsibility of the homeowner. Maintenance and repair cost are the most expensive cost to homeowners followed by taxes. According to a report by the University of Illinois Extension, homeowners need to budget 1% to 2% of the purchase price of their home, each year, to cover the costs of home maintenance and repairs. Repairs on a 30-year mortgage at 1% to 2% of the purchase price could equal half the home's value by the end of the mortgage. Renter also have more flexibility and mobility than owners. Renters are generally under a yearly contract. At the end of the period, he or she has the option to renew the contract or relocate with no penalty. Owners are at the mercy of the housing market and could take a substantial loss if he or she attempts to vacant the premises. Also, in most cases, mortgage lenders require buyers live in the property for the first three years of the mortgage.
These facts are irrefutable. From a financial standpoint, it is far better to rent than to own. Anyone that believes otherwise clearly does not understand the value of a dollars or how fragile the global economy is.
Renting vs. Buying a home: The math of renting vs. buying a home. Challenging the notion that it is always better to buy.
Renters are at a greater financial advantage than homeowners. For example, when an individual rents a place to live, he or she may only be required to pay some type of security deposit. This security deposit, in most cases, is equal to the first month's rent. It is refunded when an individual vacant the property provided that he or she has meets all contractual obligations. This is not the case for buyers. Buyers using a conventional mortgage are required to have 20% of the purchase price as a down payment plus additional money to cover closing cost. The down payment and closing cost could easily be 50 times more than any security deposit renters are required to pay.
Another advantage to renting is renter are not required to pay maintenance or repairs cost unless the damage is directly caused by the renter. Maintenance and repairs are the responsibility of the homeowner. Maintenance and repair cost are the most expensive cost to homeowners followed by taxes. According to a report by the University of Illinois Extension, homeowners need to budget 1% to 2% of the purchase price of their home, each year, to cover the costs of home maintenance and repairs. Repairs on a 30-year mortgage at 1% to 2% of the purchase price could equal half the home's value by the end of the mortgage. Renter also have more flexibility and mobility than owners. Renters are generally under a yearly contract. At the end of the period, he or she has the option to renew the contract or relocate with no penalty. Owners are at the mercy of the housing market and could take a substantial loss if he or she attempts to vacant the premises. Also, in most cases, mortgage lenders require buyers live in the property for the first three years of the mortgage.
These facts are irrefutable. From a financial standpoint, it is far better to rent than to own. Anyone that believes otherwise clearly does not understand the value of a dollars or how fragile the global economy is.
Wednesday, October 16, 2013
Are Biweekly Mortgage Payment Programs Necessary?
After purchasing my first home I received numerous offers
from mortgage lenders wanting me to participate in a biweekly mortgage
payment program. They promised to save me
thousands of dollars; improve my credit; and reduce the years of my mortgage simply by converting my 30-year fixed mortgage to their mortgage program. These promises captured my attention but promises are only as good as the character of the individual making them. I needed to learn more about this program and what I found out allowed
me to make a sound decision.
I contacted one of the lenders and was informed that a
biweekly mortgage is a mortgage paid every two weeks instead of once a
month. Since there are 52 weeks in a
year, 26 payments or 13 months of
payments are made. This reduces the interest
paid on the loan and reduces the term since additional payments are made each
year. This also improves credit by default. Anyone who pays bills on time is improving
his or her credit. Now, knowing this
information, I was ready to move forward.
I made an appointment and was met by a sales agent. The sales agent confirmed everything before
mentioned and presented me with a contract.
All was well until it was explained to me that there is an enrollment fee
of $695 plus a $9 processing fee for each payment.
I felt uncomfortable about this
newly presented information and informed the agent that I needed additional time to think about it.
The following day, I contacted the bank where my current
loan was originated. I asked a loan officer to explain the biweekly mortgage payment program.
The loan officer informed me that enrollment with an outside agency is
not necessary since most banks, including
themselves, accept biweekly payments without any special enrollments or
fees. I then called my actual bank with the same concerns and was informed of the same information. Now I'm comfortable. I was able to set up a biweekly payment through the bank with no additional fees.
Wednesday, October 9, 2013
Scams Mortgage Reverse
Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM), also known as, a reverse mortgage is a financial tool for senior homeowners who want to access the equity in their homes without having to take-out an actual home equity loan or a second mortgage. This can be an excellent opportunity for seniors, who meet the qualifications and needs, to gain control of their financial lives. This is also an excellent opportunity for individuals of low character to take advantage of those seniors through reverse mortgage scams. A reverse mortgage scam is often committed by groups of individuals working together to steal the equity of unsuspecting homeowners. This scam usually ends with homeowners losing their homes or a large debt being passed to their heirs. Of all the reverse mortgage scams the most popular and common are the Foreclosure Rescue Scam, the Free Home Scam, and the Investment Scam.
With the Foreclosure Rescue Scam, con-artist target seniors who are struggling to pay their mortgage and maybe at risk of losing their homes to foreclosure. The con-artist has an inflated home appraisal performed by an accomplice. The con-artist then works with the homeowner to obtain a reverse mortgage. During this period, the homeowner is convinced to transfer the title to the con-artist. Once the title is transferred, the homeowners is evicted from the home without gaining access to the reverse mortgage funds.
In the Free Home Scam con-artist recruits seniors to live in a home; only requiring them to pay taxes and maintain regular up-keeping. The senior is then required to take out a reverse mortgage again using an inflated appraisal. The funds are then given to the con-artist. When the senior passes away, the reverse mortgage lender is stuck with a loss due to the lack of true value in the home.
The Investment Scam is a simple scam that involves the con-artist presenting his or her target with an excellent investment opportunity with promise of huge returns. The con-artist convince the homeowner that a reverse mortgage is an great way to obtain the funds to pay for the investment. Once the con-artist receive the money, he or she informs the homeowner that the investment didn't workout; never to be heard from again.
These are just a few of the scams associated with reverse mortgages. To prevent being a victim, seniors need to avoid solicitation from any organizations that their are not familiar with and research the background of any unknown organization through the Better Business Bureau before completing any financial transactions. For a list or more information about the above mentioned scams and other frauds, readers can search the Federal Bureau of Investigation or the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development websites.
With the Foreclosure Rescue Scam, con-artist target seniors who are struggling to pay their mortgage and maybe at risk of losing their homes to foreclosure. The con-artist has an inflated home appraisal performed by an accomplice. The con-artist then works with the homeowner to obtain a reverse mortgage. During this period, the homeowner is convinced to transfer the title to the con-artist. Once the title is transferred, the homeowners is evicted from the home without gaining access to the reverse mortgage funds.
In the Free Home Scam con-artist recruits seniors to live in a home; only requiring them to pay taxes and maintain regular up-keeping. The senior is then required to take out a reverse mortgage again using an inflated appraisal. The funds are then given to the con-artist. When the senior passes away, the reverse mortgage lender is stuck with a loss due to the lack of true value in the home.
The Investment Scam is a simple scam that involves the con-artist presenting his or her target with an excellent investment opportunity with promise of huge returns. The con-artist convince the homeowner that a reverse mortgage is an great way to obtain the funds to pay for the investment. Once the con-artist receive the money, he or she informs the homeowner that the investment didn't workout; never to be heard from again.
These are just a few of the scams associated with reverse mortgages. To prevent being a victim, seniors need to avoid solicitation from any organizations that their are not familiar with and research the background of any unknown organization through the Better Business Bureau before completing any financial transactions. For a list or more information about the above mentioned scams and other frauds, readers can search the Federal Bureau of Investigation or the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development websites.
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
All In Reverse
A
reverse mortgage is a financial tool for senior homeowners who want to access
the equity in their homes without having to take-out a home equity loan. The
significance of the reverse mortgage as opposed to a normal home equity loan
is that it is paid back only when the home is sold, the last burrower dies, the owners
fails to keep the taxes and insurance current, or moves out of the house for
more than 12 consecutive months. For
some senior homeowners whom may have never heard of a reverse mortgages, also called Home
Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM), the process may seem like a scam. The very idea of receiving a monthly annuity, a line of credit, or a lump sum from
the equity already accumulated in their homes without adding an additional monthly expenses seems too good to be true. In most cases, when something
is too good to be true, it usually is. However that's not the case with reverse
mortgages. Reverse mortgages are a great option for seniors at least 62 years
old to take control of their financial lives; who intend to stay in their homes and may not have income or savings to
cover their monthly expenses. For homeowners considering a reverse mortgage, for most, the pros far outweigh the cons.
Reverse mortgage counseling is a mandatory part of the reverse mortgage application process. The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development certifies housing counselors to provide homeowners with practical information about reverse mortgages. This informs them of all the benefits, as well as, the downside to reverse mortgages.
The main benefits to a reverse mortgage is that an individual can eliminate an existing mortgage putting that money back in his or her pockets in addition to the monthly annuity they will now receive. Individuals can also establish a line of credit to eliminate medical bills and complete home improvement projects that will add value to their homes. Individuals can also receive a large lump sum that can be safely invested in a low risk mutual fund for growth.
The downside of a reverse mortgage is it has high upfront fees and interest rates. This sounds scary to some but careful management of funds received make the impact of these downsides minimum.
Reverse mortgages are not for everyone but does provide stability for those who meet the requirements and need the additional assistance. Contrary to what some may believe reverse mortgages are not a scam. It's an actual mortgage program regulated by the government. The uses of reverse mortgages have the potential to provide financial support to many senior homeowners. The key is finding a reputable lender that is look to earn honest business without taking advantage of anyone.
Guide to Reverse Mortgages
US Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD) Reverse Mortgage
The equity payment received from a reverse mortgage
can be used to pay off an existing mortgage and whatever remains is available
for the homeowner. The homeowner would not be required to repay the funds received until the home is sold. This is not the case with a normal home equity loan, the funds received during a normal home equity loans starts to be pay back almost immediately. This creates an additional monthly payment which could also create a financial hardship to homeowners living on a fixed budget. This hardship could also lead to foreclosure. With a reverse mortgage foreclosure does not come in the picture, however, the home could be loss when the last burrowers dies and the estate doesn't have the
money available to repay the mortgage. This procedure is explained during
counseling that the homeowners must receive prior to entering into a contract with a
lender.
Reverse mortgage counseling is a mandatory part of the reverse mortgage application process. The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development certifies housing counselors to provide homeowners with practical information about reverse mortgages. This informs them of all the benefits, as well as, the downside to reverse mortgages.
The main benefits to a reverse mortgage is that an individual can eliminate an existing mortgage putting that money back in his or her pockets in addition to the monthly annuity they will now receive. Individuals can also establish a line of credit to eliminate medical bills and complete home improvement projects that will add value to their homes. Individuals can also receive a large lump sum that can be safely invested in a low risk mutual fund for growth.
The downside of a reverse mortgage is it has high upfront fees and interest rates. This sounds scary to some but careful management of funds received make the impact of these downsides minimum.
Reverse mortgages are not for everyone but does provide stability for those who meet the requirements and need the additional assistance. Contrary to what some may believe reverse mortgages are not a scam. It's an actual mortgage program regulated by the government. The uses of reverse mortgages have the potential to provide financial support to many senior homeowners. The key is finding a reputable lender that is look to earn honest business without taking advantage of anyone.
US Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD) Reverse Mortgage
Wednesday, September 18, 2013
Analysis Paper: House Hustles and Helpful Hints
The mortgage industry is a business. Like all businesses the goal is to survive and make a profit. Sometimes these profits can cause individuals within the business to lose focus and take short cuts at the expense of the consumer. Sometimes these short cuts are accidental and can be corrected easily at little discomfort to the consumer. Other short cuts are intentional and go unseen for months. Additional, when discovered, to correct any mistakes may take months. During that time, the consumer could lose out on thousands of dollar. In today's house market, consumer need to know what these short cuts and swindles are to enable him or her to avoid them or be able to resolve the issue at the soonest opportunity. In addition, it would be extremely important for consumers to knowing when he or she is being hustled, it may also be helpful to provided helpful hints to assist with home purchasing. More to follow.
From Home Economics to Home
In 1986, I was in a high school home economics class surrounded by a room full of young ladies. I was the only guy in the class so my testosterone levels were off the charts. I was a wolf in a room full of sheep. Since it was the first day of school, summer flings were over and it was time to layout new blueprints. I surveyed the class briefly and started to calculate a plan of approach for each young lady, ensuring not to give-off a desperate no-good cheating dog vibe. I sat at my desk greedily rubbing my palms together as if I was about to receive a bar of gold from King Midas. My thoughts were slightly perverted and fill with ideas I got from the magazines in my stepfather's toolbox this past summer. I had the biggest devilish grin on my face that could be seen from the moon. A grin that Satan himself would have been proud of especially since he was probably guiding all my thoughts at the moment. Unfortunately that same diabolical grin also warranted the attention of the teacher, Ms. Pendergrass. Since I have the awful habit of sitting in the first chair to the right of the class, it was rather easy for Ms. Pendergrass to spot me. She stepped near and started the class by asking for everyone to give his or her name; why he or she was taking this class; and when do he or she plan to start a family. She started with me. This was my moment to shine. I stood to my feet with my chest out and head held high. I had all confidence in the world. Just as I began to say my name and my voice cracked. Some individuals would have been embarrassed by this but not me. I was the Alpha. I was wearing my Brut cologne and spent hours pressing my clothes; nothing could side track me. I took a short pause and began to clear my throat. As I was clearing my throat, something didn't clear right and I began coughing uncontrollably. Now I'm embarrassed. I ran out the class and headed straight for the water fountain. I felt like the biggest nerd on the planet. After composing myself, I returned to the class not as confident as before. When everyone was finished giving their answers, the teacher returned to me. I stood and said, "My name is Latroy. I'm here to learn how to cook. I'm not getting married until I old and established. Maybe 23 or 24." Looking back now, I hope I didn't offend her with my answer.
I got married when I was 23 years old and my wife was 19. Our first task as a couple was to find a place to live. I wasn't a huge fan of renting. Rent always felt like throwing money away or paying someone else's mortgage. We desired a mortgage of our own. When the weekend came we told ourselves, "The first real estate office we see, we will get an agent and buy a house." It was that simple, so we thought. We walked into Century 21 and said, "We want to buy a house." The agent asked a couple of questions we never considered due in our inexperience. The agent asked, "How is your credit? How much do you have for a down payment? What kind of payments per month can you afford?" All legitimate and simple questions but we just didn't put any thought into it. We were still in the honeymoon phrase of marriage where we were just happy to stare at each other and rub noses. We weren't prepared for questions so serious.
Combined, our credit was terrible. It wasn't terrible because of past due notices, garnishments, or closed by creditor accounts. It was terrible because we weren't established. We didn't have enough credit references or any credit history. We were considered a high credit risk. To make matters worst, we didn't have any money saved for a reasonable down payment. We haven't even talked about a monthly budget yet. Needless to say, we left Century 21 and lived in one of those cheap pay-by-the-month trailer parks for the next four months getting our act together.
During those four months, we save money for a down payment, established credit around town, and created a budget. We read books and had a basic understand now of how to buy a house. We weren't real estate agents but we picked up enough terminology not to be lost in the presence of a realtor. We were ready.
When the weekend came, we set-out to find another realtor. Out of shame from our previous attempt, we went to a different real estate office, Prudential. This time we were prepared for nearly any question and did well when asked. However, there was still a small issue. Before the realtor would take us out to search for a house, she referred us to a mortgage lending company to first pre-qualify for a loan. This was when we were informed we qualified for a $90K house at a variable interest rate of 12%. I thought that was a good deal considering when we established our around the town credit, everything was 29%. Finally we could began house hunting. The realtor never once showed us a house under $100K. She also told us we could save more money for a larger down payment to make up the different in the loan amount because most of the houses under $100K were in ghetto crime rampant neighborhoods. I took offends to this. The fact that I grew up in a ghetto crime rampant neighborhood myself wasn't what offended me but the fact that she was using it as a scare tactic to coerce us to buy outside of our price range to fatten her purse. We parted ways that day and went to Coldwell Bankers.
The agent at Coldwell was very professional and did exactly as we requested. She worked within our budget and even advised us to stay well below our price range in case we decide to have a family soon. Within a week, we found wonderful three bedroom house for $67K at a fixed interest rate of 10% in a great subdivision near work. We closed on the house and within 30 days we were moving in. It was perfect.
My first home buying experience blessed me with a couple of lessons. First, if an individual is looking to purchase a home, he or she should concentrate on ensuring his or her credit is a perfect as possible. This may require contacting financial offices to dispute mistakes reported on his or her credit report. Also, it may require an individual to pay-off particular accounts or open accounts with low balances that can easily be paid-off to establish credit.
The next lesson I took from this experience, individuals have to stick to a budget and exercise a regular regiment of saving money. This is a life changing routine and seen by some as extremely difficult. This is difficult because individuals are constantly bombarded with advertisements to buy items that aren't needed but wanted. Advertisement agencies primary job is to make individuals unhappy and their secondary job is to provide the remedy for their unhappiness. Individuals just have to decide what's more important.
My final lesson in house buying is to trust no one. Realtors earn a commission from your purchase. Rightfully they should considering that they spend hours showing you homes, giving advice, and assisting you at closing to ensuring you do get completely hosed-over. But it's important not to forget realtors work for the client not just for themselves to get the biggest commission as possible. The same goes for lenders. Before an individual settles on financing, he or she should shop a few different lenders to see who offers the best rates. Buying a home should be satisfying and not a ripoff. Every part of it should feel good and if it doesn't, there should be a reasonable explanation for an individuals dissatisfaction.
I got married when I was 23 years old and my wife was 19. Our first task as a couple was to find a place to live. I wasn't a huge fan of renting. Rent always felt like throwing money away or paying someone else's mortgage. We desired a mortgage of our own. When the weekend came we told ourselves, "The first real estate office we see, we will get an agent and buy a house." It was that simple, so we thought. We walked into Century 21 and said, "We want to buy a house." The agent asked a couple of questions we never considered due in our inexperience. The agent asked, "How is your credit? How much do you have for a down payment? What kind of payments per month can you afford?" All legitimate and simple questions but we just didn't put any thought into it. We were still in the honeymoon phrase of marriage where we were just happy to stare at each other and rub noses. We weren't prepared for questions so serious.
Combined, our credit was terrible. It wasn't terrible because of past due notices, garnishments, or closed by creditor accounts. It was terrible because we weren't established. We didn't have enough credit references or any credit history. We were considered a high credit risk. To make matters worst, we didn't have any money saved for a reasonable down payment. We haven't even talked about a monthly budget yet. Needless to say, we left Century 21 and lived in one of those cheap pay-by-the-month trailer parks for the next four months getting our act together.
During those four months, we save money for a down payment, established credit around town, and created a budget. We read books and had a basic understand now of how to buy a house. We weren't real estate agents but we picked up enough terminology not to be lost in the presence of a realtor. We were ready.
When the weekend came, we set-out to find another realtor. Out of shame from our previous attempt, we went to a different real estate office, Prudential. This time we were prepared for nearly any question and did well when asked. However, there was still a small issue. Before the realtor would take us out to search for a house, she referred us to a mortgage lending company to first pre-qualify for a loan. This was when we were informed we qualified for a $90K house at a variable interest rate of 12%. I thought that was a good deal considering when we established our around the town credit, everything was 29%. Finally we could began house hunting. The realtor never once showed us a house under $100K. She also told us we could save more money for a larger down payment to make up the different in the loan amount because most of the houses under $100K were in ghetto crime rampant neighborhoods. I took offends to this. The fact that I grew up in a ghetto crime rampant neighborhood myself wasn't what offended me but the fact that she was using it as a scare tactic to coerce us to buy outside of our price range to fatten her purse. We parted ways that day and went to Coldwell Bankers.
The agent at Coldwell was very professional and did exactly as we requested. She worked within our budget and even advised us to stay well below our price range in case we decide to have a family soon. Within a week, we found wonderful three bedroom house for $67K at a fixed interest rate of 10% in a great subdivision near work. We closed on the house and within 30 days we were moving in. It was perfect.
My first home buying experience blessed me with a couple of lessons. First, if an individual is looking to purchase a home, he or she should concentrate on ensuring his or her credit is a perfect as possible. This may require contacting financial offices to dispute mistakes reported on his or her credit report. Also, it may require an individual to pay-off particular accounts or open accounts with low balances that can easily be paid-off to establish credit.
The next lesson I took from this experience, individuals have to stick to a budget and exercise a regular regiment of saving money. This is a life changing routine and seen by some as extremely difficult. This is difficult because individuals are constantly bombarded with advertisements to buy items that aren't needed but wanted. Advertisement agencies primary job is to make individuals unhappy and their secondary job is to provide the remedy for their unhappiness. Individuals just have to decide what's more important.
My final lesson in house buying is to trust no one. Realtors earn a commission from your purchase. Rightfully they should considering that they spend hours showing you homes, giving advice, and assisting you at closing to ensuring you do get completely hosed-over. But it's important not to forget realtors work for the client not just for themselves to get the biggest commission as possible. The same goes for lenders. Before an individual settles on financing, he or she should shop a few different lenders to see who offers the best rates. Buying a home should be satisfying and not a ripoff. Every part of it should feel good and if it doesn't, there should be a reasonable explanation for an individuals dissatisfaction.
Wednesday, September 11, 2013
The Next Big Housing Crisis Is Only Days Away
The housing market is on the verge of another great financial crisis. Fortunately for millions of Americans this crisis won't have the same negative impact on the United States' economy as did the collapse of 2008. During this crisis the American public won't witness massive foreclosures or feel swindled by big corporation as Americans ante up for another greed driven bail out. In fact, this crisis will probably go unnoticed by the average American. The only time it will be mentioned will likely be in an occasional brief news broadcast as just an update to the current housing market. Now, if it's not first page news or effects the American public, then how is it a crisis?
In January 2014 the new Qualified Residential Mortgage rules proposed by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) comes in effect. The Qualified Residential Mortgage rule will limit individuals from taking out a mortgage if the monthly payments causes his or her debt to income ratio to exceed 43 percent. The previous rule was 36 percent. A seven percent increase doesn't seem like much of a deal breaker, however, the new rule also takes into consideration students loans, property taxes, flood insurance, and any other fees associated with home ownership. These changes are designed to protect consumers and makes sure the buyer doesn't take on more then he or she can handle, however, these rules are make it hard to qualify for a loan. Every part of a person's finances are being scrutinized to prevent another mortgage collapse. Many would-be buyers will not qualify for loans and some individuals will be too discouraged to even try.
As a result of tougher lending practices, the Mortgage Bankers Association estimates that loan originations will drop by 10 percent this year and The National Association of Realtors predicts these changes in lending will result in 20 percent fewer loans in 2014. That's equivalent to over 600,000 less homes per year being sold. With the government agencies currently still in possession of 90 percent of all outstanding home loans, courtesy Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, this large inventory will take well over 10 years to decrease the even the slightest. The only hope for a better outcome is if private sector bails them out and assume a portion of these outstanding loans.
Meanwhile the best course of action for potential buyers is to continue working on improving his or her credit score, increase savings, and stay tuned for possible changes to come.
Qualified Residential Mortgage Rule & National Realtors Association
In January 2014 the new Qualified Residential Mortgage rules proposed by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) comes in effect. The Qualified Residential Mortgage rule will limit individuals from taking out a mortgage if the monthly payments causes his or her debt to income ratio to exceed 43 percent. The previous rule was 36 percent. A seven percent increase doesn't seem like much of a deal breaker, however, the new rule also takes into consideration students loans, property taxes, flood insurance, and any other fees associated with home ownership. These changes are designed to protect consumers and makes sure the buyer doesn't take on more then he or she can handle, however, these rules are make it hard to qualify for a loan. Every part of a person's finances are being scrutinized to prevent another mortgage collapse. Many would-be buyers will not qualify for loans and some individuals will be too discouraged to even try.
As a result of tougher lending practices, the Mortgage Bankers Association estimates that loan originations will drop by 10 percent this year and The National Association of Realtors predicts these changes in lending will result in 20 percent fewer loans in 2014. That's equivalent to over 600,000 less homes per year being sold. With the government agencies currently still in possession of 90 percent of all outstanding home loans, courtesy Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, this large inventory will take well over 10 years to decrease the even the slightest. The only hope for a better outcome is if private sector bails them out and assume a portion of these outstanding loans.
Meanwhile the best course of action for potential buyers is to continue working on improving his or her credit score, increase savings, and stay tuned for possible changes to come.
Qualified Residential Mortgage Rule & National Realtors Association
Wednesday, September 4, 2013
Refund or Bail Out; Freddie and Fannie Has To Go
On the 10th of August 2013 President Obama conducted a
weekly addresses titled, "A Better Bargain for Responsible, Middle Class
Homeowners." In his address, he spoke of progress and improvements being
made in the housing market which in the long run will aid in strengthening the
U.S. economy. A key point that was made but not expanded upon was winding
down on companies like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In order to strengthen
the housing market, Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac must be eliminated.
Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac showed little responsibility when gambling with American
taxpayers' money through subprime loan lending practices. A subprime mortgage is a type of mortgage
that is normally made out to borrowers with low or poor credit ratings who do
not qualify for a regular conventional mortgage. The borrower would be seen as a high risk of
defaulting on the loan and given a different criteria to qualify. High risk individuals are those individuals
with a high debt to income ratio, individuals with poor credit, or unstable fluctuating
incomes. In order to compensate for the
risk, these individuals were subjected to higher interest rates and additional
fees tacked on to their loan. Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac made these loans possible for individuals seen as high risk
borrowers by providing local banks with federal money to finance home mortgages
in an attempt to raise levels of home ownership and the availability of
affordable housing. Essentially they
made it easier to purchase a house. This
does not sound that bad but the truth is, not everyone can afford the house he
or she desires. In an interview on BBC at 2100 BST on September 10, 17, and
24, (2009, rebroadcasted) Alan Greenspan, Chairman of the Federal Reserve of
the United States from 1987 to 2006, stated:
I have changed my mind about
deregulation. The crisis on the financial
industry’s inability to monitor itself was ‘‘speculative excesses’’ and a normal function
of capitalism. I contributed much of the problem to human nature: ‘‘It’s human nature,
unless somebody can find a way to change human nature, we will have more crises and
none of them will look like this because no two crises have anything in common,
except human nature.
industry’s inability to monitor itself was ‘‘speculative excesses’’ and a normal function
of capitalism. I contributed much of the problem to human nature: ‘‘It’s human nature,
unless somebody can find a way to change human nature, we will have more crises and
none of them will look like this because no two crises have anything in common,
except human nature.
The human nature element is what drove
both lender and borrower to act in the way which they did. The borrower saw a opportunity to get
something he or she wanted and the lender saw an opportunity to make a profit. At first glance this did not seems to be a poor
plan, assuming borrowers would make good on their loans, but this created more
of a demand for housing which ultimately led to inflated home prices. In addition, lenders began to ignore the high
risk and felt safe because they were using government funds instead of their
own to cover bad mortgages. As a result,
they lessened some qualification requirements and waived other criteria because
they knew Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac assumed the greatest risk. This became the norm. Lender approved more high risk loans and even
solicited individuals to purchase new homes or refinancing his or her current
loan to gain access to the home's escrow or equity. Lenders were guaranteed
more money and still assumed no additional risk.
Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac assumed all risk associated with subprime lending
practices. They bought mortgages on the
secondary market, pooled the loans together,
and sold them as a mortgage backed securities to investors on the open
market. The secondary mortgage market
increases the supply of money available for mortgage lending and increases the
money available for new home purchases.
Ordinarily this provided Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and other investors
with a great return on their investment but as borrowers began to default on their
loans, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were obligated to cover the losses even if it
meant a government bailout at the cost of U.S. taxpayers. The question we all now have to ask is do we
want another bailout?
Works Cited
Hansen, Laura L., and Siamak Movahedi. "Wall Street
Scandals: The Myth Of Individual
Greed." Sociological Forum
25.2 (2010): 367-374.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)